Getting an Ellipse by Stretching/Shrinking a Circle

This lesson is optional in the Precalculus course.

This lesson assumes knowledge of Equations of Ellipses in Standard Form: Foci on the $x$-axis.

You may find yourself thinking that an ellipse looks like a ‘deformed circle’: you know, just grab the ‘ends’ and stretch or compress the circle. And—you'd be correct, as this lesson shows!

By using earlier work on horizontal and vertical stretching/shrinking of graphs, we get the equation $\,\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\,$ easily, as follows:

Horizontal Stretch/Shrink of a Circle

horizontal stretch/shrink of a circle

Circle of radius $\,1\,,$ in blue:
$x^2 + y^2 = 1$

Horizontal stretch, in red:
$\displaystyle\frac{x^2}{a^2} + y^2 = 1\,,$ for $\,a \gt 1$

Horizontal shrink, in green:
$\displaystyle\frac{x^2}{a^2} + y^2 = 1\,,$ for $\,0 \lt a \lt 1$

Start with the circle of radius $\,1\,,$ centered at the origin, which has equation $\,x^2 + y^2 = 1\,.$

Replace every $\,x\,$ in the circle equation by $\displaystyle\,\frac xa\,$:

$$ \begin{gather} \left(\frac xa\right)^2 + y^2 = 1\cr\cr \frac{x^2}{a^2} + y^2 = 1 \end{gather} $$

This moves a point $\,(x,y)\,$ on the circle to a new point $\,(ax,y)\,$ on an ellipse. For example, the point $\,(1,0)\,$ on the circle moves to $\,(a,0)\,$ on the ellipse.

If $\,a \gt 1\,,$ it is a horizontal stretch.

If $\,0 \lt a \lt 1\,,$ it is a horizontal shrink.

Vertical Stretch/Shrink of a Circle

vertical stretch/shrink of a circle

Circle of radius $\,1\,,$ in blue:
$x^2 + y^2 = 1$

Vertical stretch, in red:
$\displaystyle x^2 + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\,,$ for $\,b \gt 1$

Vertical shrink, in green:
$\displaystyle x^2 + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\,,$ for $\,0 \lt b \lt 1$

Similarly, replace every $\,y\,$ with $\,\frac yb\,$ in the equation $\,x^2 + y^2 = 1\,,$ giving the new equation $\,x^2 + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\,.$

This moves a point $\,(x,y)\,$ on the circle to a new point $\,(x,by)\,$ on an ellipse. For example, the point $\,(0,1)\,$ on the circle moves to $\,(0,b)\,$ on the ellipse.

If $\,b \gt 1\,,$ it is a vertical stretch.

If $\,0 \lt b \lt 1\,,$ it is a vertical shrink.

Combined Horizontal/Vertical Stretch/Shrink of a Circle

By replacing both $\,x\,$ by $\,\frac xa\,$ and $\,y\,$ by $\,\frac yb\,,$ we get the equation $\,\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\,.$

combined horizontal/vertical stretch/shrink of a circle

Circle of radius $\,1\,,$ in blue:
$x^2 + y^2 = 1$

Ellipse, in green:
$$\color{green}{\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1}$$ $\,a \gt 1\,,$ Horizontal stretch
$\,0 \lt b \lt 1\,,$ Vertical shrink

A Different (More General) Approach for Transformations Involving $\,y$

People who have thoroughly studied Horizontal and Vertical Stretching/Shrinking may be a bit perplexed by the treatment of the transformations involving $\,y\,$ in this section. If this is you, then keep reading!

In that earlier section, we were dealing with a very specific type of equation involving $\,x\,$ and $\,y\,$:  an equation of the form $\,y = f(x)\,.$ Such an equation has $\,y\,$ all by itself on one side; the other side involves only $\,x\,.$

For equations of this special form $\,y = f(x)\,,$ it is easier to treat transformations involving $\,x\,$ and $\,y\,$ differently. We quickly review those differences next:

Transformations Involving $\,y\,$ for Equations of the Form $\,y = f(x)$

Transformations involving $\,y\,$ are intuitive—they work the way you think they should!

The language used is:  ‘DO THIS to the previous $y$-value.’

Example:  Start with the graph of $\,y = x^2\,.$ Multiply each $y$-value of points on the graph by $\,3\,$ (a vertical stretch). What is the equation of the resulting graph?

Answer:  $\,y = 3x^2$
Multiply the previous $y$-value by $\,3\,.$

In other words:  DO WHAT to the previous $y$-value?
Answer:  Multiply by $\,3\,.$

$$ \begin{gather} \text{Original equation:}\cr y = \color{red}{x^2}\cr\cr \text{New equation:}\cr y = \overbrace{3\underbrace{\color{red}{x^2}}_{\text{previous $y$-value}}}^{\text{multiply previous $y$-value by $3$}}\cr \end{gather} $$

Transformations Involving $\,x\,$ for Equations of the Form $\,y = f(x)$

Transformations involving $\,x\,$ are not intuitive—they don't work the way you think they should!

The language used is:  ‘REPLACE the previous $x$-values by ...’

Example:  Start with the graph of $\,y = x^2\,.$ Multiply each $x$-value of points on the graph by $\,3\,$ (a horizontal stretch). What is the equation of the resulting graph?

Answer:  $y = (\frac{x}{3})^2$
Replace every $x$ in the original equation by $\,\frac{x}{3}\,.$

$$ \begin{gather} \text{Original equation:}\cr y = {\color{red}{x}}^2\cr\cr \text{New equation:}\cr y = \underbrace{\bigl(\color{red}{\frac{x}{3}}\bigr)^2}_{\text{replace $x$ by $\frac x3$}} \end{gather} $$

To get $x$-values in the graph multiplied by $\,3\,,$ we must replace every $\,x\,$ in the equation by $\,\frac{x}{3}\,$ ($\,x\,$ divided by $\,3\,$). Counter-intuitive!

Transformations Involving $\,y\,$ for Equations that are not of the Form $\,y = f(x)$

Sometimes you need to apply graphical transformations to equations that can't be put in the form $\,y = f(x)\,.$

If the graph of an equation doesn't pass a vertical line test, then it can't be put in the form $\,y = f(x)\,.$

The ellipse equation $\,\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\,$ is such an equation. Its graph doesn't pass the vertical line test. Here, it is possible to solve for $\,y\,,$ but it introduces an annoying square root and ‘plus or minus’ sign.

To apply graphical transformations to any equation in $\,x\,$ and $\,y\,$ (no matter how mixed-up the variables might be), just use the  ‘replace every...’  language for both $\,x\,$ and $\,y\,.$

(Then, both cases are equally counter-intuitive!)

For example, if we want every $y$-value in a graph to be multiplied by $\,3\,,$ then replace every $\,y\,$ in the original equation by $\,y\,$ divided by $\,3\,.$

Or, if we want every $y$-value in a graph to be divided by $\,3\,,$ then replace every $\,y\,$ in the original equation by $\,y\,$ multiplied by $\,3\,.$

This more general technique certainly works in the ‘$\,y = f(x)\,$’ case, but isn't needed, as the next example illustrates:

Example

Start with the graph of $\,y = x^2\,.$ Multiply each $y$-value of points on the graph by $\,3\,$ (a vertical stretch). What is the equation of the resulting graph?

Answer: the New Way

Replace every $\,y\,$ by $\,\frac{y}{3}\,,$ giving the new equation:

$$\frac y3 = x^2$$

Answer: the Old Way

This is a transformation involving $\,y\,,$ which is intuitive. Multiply the previous $y$-value by $\,3\,,$ giving:

$$y = 3x^2$$

They Give the Same Result!

Of course, the equations $\,\frac y3 = x^2\,$ and $\,y = 3x^2\,$ are equivalent!

Just multiply both sides of $\,\frac y3 = x^2\,$ by $\,3\,$ to get $\,y = 3x^2\,.$

There are more details on this ‘new approach’ in a future section.

Concept Practice